—Services

When You Need More Than a Standard Review


Each review is tailored to the specific questions your file raises. Here is what Evidence Based Consulting offers and when each service applies.

Standard of Care Evaluation

01

An independent assessment of whether the nursing care provided met accepted clinical standards under the circumstances present at the time. This evaluation considers what a reasonably prudent nurse would have done given the same patient, setting, and available resources. It identifies where care met the standard, where it fell short, and what that deviation means for the file.


EHR Audit Trail Analysis

02

A forensic review of electronic health record metadata to determine when entries were created, accessed, or edited. EHR systems capture a hidden layer of data behind every note — timestamps, user IDs, and edit histories that the printed record does not show. This analysis can reveal late entries, altered documentation, and access patterns that raise questions about the integrity of the record.


Merit Review & Case Screening

03

An early evaluation of the file to assess clinical viability and exposure before your team invests significant resources. This review looks at whether the clinical facts support the allegations, identifies the strongest and weakest points in the record, and gives your team a clear picture of what you are working with at the outset.


Medical Record

Review & Chronology

04

A clear, organized review of the medical record that identifies key clinical events, documentation patterns, gaps in care, and areas of concern. Written in plain language for claims professionals, not clinicians. The chronology gives your team a reliable timeline of what happened, when it happened, and what the record does and does not support.


Healthcare Liability

Risk Assessment

05

A comprehensive evaluation of a healthcare file's overall exposure before your team commits to a direction. This review looks at the clinical picture, the nursing and facility issues present, future care implications, and where the greatest liability risk lives in the file. It gives your team a clear starting point before deciding how to proceed.

“Every review is tailored to the specific clinical question your file is raising.”
— Tiffany Moss-Hawkins